Network mem­ber Ned Conger sent this one along today that caught me by surprise.

Turns out the Pentagon has been tweak­ing the soft­ware a bit on the AIM-​​9X Sidewinder to hit ground tar­gets. Strategy Page reported it but our boy Steve Trimble had it as well — and the StratPage entry calls it the AIM-​​7x — oops… From Flight Global:

The mod­i­fi­ca­tion allows the same AIM-​​9X to strike both air and ground tar­gets. Jeff White, Raytheon’s busi­ness devel­op­ment man­ager for AIM-​​9X, declines to describe the mod­i­fi­ca­tion in detail, but says it involves only soft­ware changes. The AIM-​​9X infrared seeker, prox­im­ity fuse and blast/​fragmentation war­head remain unchanged.

During a 23 September Gulf of Mexico test, a US Air Force F-​​15C fired the air-​​to-​​surface AIM-​​9X and hit a speed­ing “cigar boat”, a type com­monly used by drug smug­glers. “The mis­sile went right through the boat,” says White.

The F-​​15C test fol­lows a pre­vi­ous shot by an F-​​16 at a sim­i­lar tar­get, which also scored a hit on the boat, he adds.

Anyway, seems as if Raytheon has done some rejig­ger­ing to allow the F-​​15C (and F-​​22) a ground attack role with its com­pli­ment of side-​​shooting Sidewinders. The com­bi­na­tion of the helment-​​mounted cuing sys­tems and highly advanced heat seak­ers allow the air-​​to-​​air mis­sile to plink hot tar­gets on the ground as well.

Sounds like a darn good idea. I’d be inter­ested to learn what the dam­age yield is with one of those pup­pies. A 20 pound blast frag war­head doesn’t seem like much to me, but it sounds like it could be effec­tive against vehi­cles. And after all, the AGM-​​114 Hellfire has a nearly 30 pound war­head and has no prob­lem tak­ing out HVTs.

– Christian


http://defensetech.org/2009/12/14/sidewind...sile/#idc-cover